[ad_1]
The U.S. Division of Justice (DOJ) and disgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) are presently entangled in a authorized tussle over their respective witnesses’ record, in response to Sept. 11 courtroom filings.
CryptoSlate beforehand reported that the DOJ and SBF had moved to disqualify all of the knowledgeable witnesses referred to as upon by every social gathering, citing numerous causes, together with deceptive expertise and inadequate disclosure filings.
Each events, nonetheless, have filed new defenses on why the Courtroom ought to approve their witnesses.
SBF defends witnesses
Based on SBF attorneys, the federal government’s opposition to their consumer’s knowledgeable witness record is overreaching as a result of none of their proposed testimony could be prejudicial or usurp the features of the Courtroom or the jury.
The attorneys argued that the motions had been additional makes an attempt by the federal government to thwart SBF’s basic proper to current a protection and even to introduce proof that is likely to be inconsistent with their theories.
They added that the federal government was “seeing ghosts” as not one of the witnesses would offer “improper opinion relating to Mr. Bankman-Fried’s information of essential details or his intent with respect to the crimes with which he’s charged.”
SBF’s witness record features a lawyer, a regulation professor, a knowledge analytics knowledgeable, a monetary knowledgeable, and consultants. They would offer witness testimony on FTX operations and the agency’s infrastructure.
The federal government says its knowledgeable testimony is ‘vital and applicable.’
In its submitting, the U.S. authorities argued that the testimony of its sole witness, Professor Peter Easton, would play an important position in serving to the jury think about the monetary proof within the case.
A part of the submitting reads:
“Professor Peter Easton will assist the jury perceive Alameda Analysis’s substantial unfavourable balances on FTX.com, the commingling and use of FTX buyer funds, and the ensuing deficits in FTX and Alameda Analysis financial institution accounts and cryptocurrency wallets.”
The U.S. authorities added that Professor Easton had drawn his testimony from analyzing dozens of financial institution accounts, information from FTX’s transaction database, information from Alameda Analysis’s lenders, cryptocurrency pricing information, and blockchain data.
Based on the federal government, SBF’s transfer to reject this testimony relies on a misreading and inconsistent with the regulation.
The put up SBF, US justice division wrangle over knowledgeable witness credibility appeared first on CryptoSlate.
[ad_2]
Source link
