The Optimism Basis not too long ago unloaded a whopping 116 million OP tokens, valued at $157 million, in a non-public & deliberate sale citing ‘treasury administration functions.’ The transaction, whereas deliberate, has rekindled the continuing debate in regards to the true essence of decentralization within the crypto-sphere.
The sale of the tokens was performed privately and concerned seven undisclosed patrons. The tokens have been drawn from an unallocated part of Optimism’s treasury, which remains to be flush with round $1.25 billion, in accordance with DefiLlama knowledge.
The patrons can delegate the newly acquired tokens to 3rd events, enabling them to take part in blockchain governance. This characteristic has raised eyebrows, contemplating the potential to disrupt the facility dynamics within the Optimism ecosystem.
Financials and Market Response
Regardless of the profitable sale, OP tokens haven’t loved a bullish part. The present buying and selling value is $1.35, registering a 2.19% dip within the final 24 hours. Moreover, the circulating provide of OP tokens is eighteen.59%, which begs questions in regards to the shortage and demand of those tokens.
Earlier this week, Optimism additionally issued its third neighborhood airdrop, distributing 19.4 million tokens amongst over 31,000 customers. Nevertheless, an extra 570 million tokens have been earmarked for future airdrops, including one other layer of complexity to the tokenomics of OP.
The Controversy: A Query of Governance?
The token sale hasn’t gone down effectively with everybody within the crypto neighborhood. A tweet by crypto influencer Hsaka critiqued the method, highlighting the absence of a neighborhood vote within the determination to promote the tokens. “In a very decentralized world, there would have been a vote for this sale,” Hsaka tweeted, together with a hypothetical voting situation illustrating how the neighborhood may have blocked the sale.
One other Twitter person identified that the tokens have been bought to seven nameless funding funds with a lock-in interval of two years, elevating additional questions in regards to the transparency and decision-making course of inside the Optimism neighborhood.
The Optimism Basis made some huge cash from its large token sale but additionally upset some individuals who care about shared decision-making. In a world the place everybody is meant to have a say, ignoring that’s in opposition to the rules of decentralization.